Friday, June 26, 2009

On Wilderness

I took Introduction to Outdoor recreation last fall, and it was driving me crazy b/c I couldn't remember the wording in class:
“A wilderness, in contrast with those areas where man and his own works dominate the landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where the earth and its community of life are untrammeled by man, where man himself is a visitor who does not remain. An area of wilderness is further defined to mean in this Act an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its primeval character and influence, without permanent improvements or human habitation, which is protected and managed so as to preserve its natural conditions and which (1) generally appears to have been affected primarily by the forces of nature, with the imprint of man’s work substantially unnoticeable; (2) has outstanding opportunities for solitude or a primitive and unconfined type of recreation; (3) has at least five thousand acres of land or is of sufficient size as to make practicable its preservation and use in an unimpaired condition; and (4) may also contain ecological, geological, or other features of scientific, educational, scenic, or historical value."
-The Wilderness Act of 1964

I think some of the key elements are 'untrammeld by man', 'man does not remain' and retaining 'primeval character and influence'.

-Jessica

3 comments:

  1. So, was then the land first visited by the Europeans in N. America wilderness based on this definition?
    Did they view the wilderness as something to be "tamed"? Why did they want to "tame" the wilderness...to have access to rescources?
    Do we still want to tame the wilderness today?
    It seems like the ANWR Alaska National Wildlife Refuge is desinated as wilderness and yet because of that we are not able to tap into the oil resources that it holds. Why shouldn't we tame that wilderness too?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Who is this "anonymous" person?? Are you really asking why we shouldn't tap into ANWR? Maybe because it is one of the last areas that is close to being "untrammeled?" Maybe because the oil industry is notorious for its destructive practices? Maybe because the amount of oil it MAY provide is just a few percent of the US total need?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think "anonymous" is Dr.A not signed in?

    ReplyDelete